Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Maude of Horsham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Superannuation Bill.


Superannuation Bill

I hear what the hon. Gentleman says, and the fact is that in any employment the terms that apply are those that apply when an event happens. People get sick pay when they are sick; they get redundancy pay when they are made redundant. The statutory redundancy scheme, which has the force of law—as indeed this scheme does, as it is a statutory compensation scheme for loss of office—and the compensation to which people are entitled when they lose their office is that which is in force at the time. That is the view that the previous Government took, robustly, having considered—I presume—all the issues as carefully as we have done. So there is a strong view on both sides of the House that this scheme is unsustainable and unaffordable. Even in good circumstances it would be unaffordable, but in today's tragically difficult financial position—with the budget deficit that we inherited so out of control and high—it would be indefensible to allow it to remain unreformed, as a matter of fairness.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c213 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Compensation Civil servants Civil service Redundancy pay Redundancy Low pay Trade unions Public and Commercial Services Union Sunset clauses
Legislation
Superannuation Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk