Proceeding contribution from Lord Maude of Horsham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Superannuation Bill.
Superannuation Bill
That is completely right. My hon. Friend puts his finger precisely on the point. Our view is that one union cannot be allowed to prevent necessary reform of a scheme that is unsustainable and unaffordable—and, of course, that is precisely the view taken by the last Government. The order laid by the right hon. Member for Dulwich and West Norwood (Tessa Jowell), which came into effect, I think, in April this year—before it was rapidly quashed by the judicial review sought by the Public and Commercial Services Union—was made on the basis that one union could not be allowed to hold up the necessary process of reform. However, I stress again that we seek genuinely to negotiate additional protection for the lower paid.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c215
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Civil servants Civil service Redundancy pay Redundancy Low pay Trade unions Public and Commercial Services Union Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Superannuation Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:47:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_662820
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_662820
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_662820