Proceeding contribution from Baroness Jowell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Superannuation Bill.
Superannuation Bill
No, I am going to make some progress—and I think that the hon. Gentleman has already made an intervention. The very fact that the Bill is designed to expire within 12 months makes its own case for its unworkability as a long-term solution. Instead the Bill is being deliberately used to force the trade unions into compliance. As such it should be seen as a very unusual use of parliamentary procedure to ask Parliament to pass legislation that—as the Minister has made clear—it is hoped will not be implemented. The Deputy Prime Minister has stated—presumably on behalf of the Government—that fairness will be at the heart of everything the Government do. However, as with so much that the coalition does, the terms put forward under the Bill do not meet the first basic test: they are not fair because some of our longest-serving, and often lowest-paid, civil servants receive no protection under the proposals.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 515 c222-3
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Civil servants Civil service Redundancy pay Redundancy Low pay Trade unions Public and Commercial Services Union Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Superannuation Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:47:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_662856
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_662856
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_662856