Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from John McDonnell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Superannuation Bill.


Superannuation Bill

The hon. Gentleman came to the House at the last election, so he may not know that I was probably not the most vociferous supporter of the economic policies of the previous Government. I was a critic, and if he looks at the alternative Budgets that I provided annually—which this House rejected, but never mind—he will see that there would have been no deficit if I had implemented them. There would have been a redistribution of wealth and an increase in taxation, which would have enabled us to afford the public expenditure that our society requires. I am not a Keynesian; I am a Marxist—[Laughter.] Well, it is interesting how true some of the predictions in ““Das Kapital”” are coming. Even if one takes a Keynesian position, the last thing one would do at this point in time is reduce aggregate demand and cut jobs, wages and conditions of service. It flies in the face of reality to lay off large numbers of civil servants, and then cut the income and compensation arrangements that they receive. Anyway, Mr Deputy Speaker would rule us out of order if we went into another economic diatribe.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c228-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Compensation Civil servants Civil service Redundancy pay Redundancy Low pay Trade unions Public and Commercial Services Union Sunset clauses
Legislation
Superannuation Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk