Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order).
London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order)
My hon. Friend makes a fair point, but rather than regard that point as fatal to the Bill's future progress, the right approach is to say, as I will in relation to other matters, that I hope the Bill's promoters will discuss with officials in the relevant Departments how they might seek clarification and improvements. I am grateful to him for highlighting that matter. Similarly, we have to ensure that there is fairness in relation to the provisions in clause 8 for pavement charges. I understand the argument behind the clause, but equally we must ensure that an undue burden is not placed upon small local shops. We need to ensure proportionality.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 516 c385-6
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Cafes Fixed penalties Greater London Hygiene Food Local government Motor vehicles Powers of entry Litter Powers Multiple occupation Packaging Pedestrian areas Public lavatories Standards Sales Safety Tenants Street trading Take-away food Sex establishments
- Legislation
- London Local Authorities Bill (HL) 2007-08 to 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:09:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_668133
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_668133
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_668133