Proceeding contribution from Alun Cairns (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 October 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Strategic Defence and Security Review.
Strategic Defence and Security Review
My constituents and I—and, it seems, many other Members in the Chamber—are naturally disappointed that the Metrix proposal for St Athan will not go ahead. Will the Prime Minister confirm that St Athan remains central to defence training and will he make available some of his officials to provide a detailed breakdown of why Metrix was not suitable?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 516 c823
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Armed forces Cost effectiveness Defence Army Deployment Air force Cybercrime Defence equipment Finance National security Public expenditure Navy Aircraft carriers Strategic Defence and Security Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:16:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670204
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670204
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670204