Proceeding contribution from Theresa Villiers (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 October 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Railway Industry.
Railway Industry
I am sorry, but I have only two or three minutes, and I want to respond to an awful lot of points. The hon. Gentleman and others talked about the electrification of the railways. We included our support for electrification in our programme for government and we recognise its benefits. It will support our sustainability objectives and improve services for passengers. It will become more and more of a greener option as we decarbonise the electricity-generating network. The pace at which we can deliver electrification will obviously depend on affordability and the priority of tackling the deficit. Much will depend on the comprehensive spending review announcement tomorrow. Of course, these decisions are also linked with the work on the high-level output specification rolling stock programme, Thameslink and the future of the IEP. An announcement will be made on those in due course. Lastly, in the brief time that I have, I want to reiterate the Government's support for high-speed rail, which is a vital upgrade for our transport network. We recently announced our support for a Y-shaped network, with a line to Manchester and trains running on from there to the west coast main line and Scotland, and another line splitting off at Birmingham and going through the east midlands and South Yorkshire to Leeds, with trains, again, running on to the existing network and destinations further north. We will consult on that shortly. We will also have regard to the communities affected by the line's local impact before taking final decisions on whether to go ahead and what route to take. We appreciate that realistically these lines can be delivered only in phases, but our ultimate goal is to deliver the national network, for which I am sure there will be cross-party support. Much has been achieved since privatisation, but we need a fresh focus on reducing costs in the railways that we already have. We need a drive to deliver high-speed rail because of the huge benefits that it can provide. The coalition is determined to meet both those challenges, and I welcome the representations that I have received on them today.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 516 c203-4WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Capital investment Elizabeth line Fares Fees and charges Infrastructure Freight Franchises High speed trains Pay Managers Railways Railway network London Underground Network Rail Scotland Strikes Jarvis Rail Value for Money Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:24:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670850
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670850
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_670850