Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 1 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Identity Documents Bill.


Identity Documents Bill

I think that there might be some advantages for security in this scheme, and I would like to know the Government’s view on that. From the exchanges I have been reading from, it seems that there may well have been some advantages so far as security is concerned. Indeed, I am reminded that Mr Fazackerley was asked a question by the honourable David Simpson: "““On a point of clarification, Mr Green asked Mike—" I presume that is Mr Fazackerley. I do not think that we would call an expert witness by their Christian name in this House, but perhaps I am being old-fashioned— "““a question about the fact that it takes eight to 12 weeks to carry out the security side of the process, but if a card is lost or misplaced, it can be replaced within 24 hours. Did you say that no further security checks were carried out?””." Mr Fazackerley answered by saying: "““At that point. The benefit that we got from the system was that you were absolutely sure that the person who was standing in the pass office was the right person””. —[Official Report, Commons Public Bill Committee, 29/6/10; col. 28.]" Whether what he said about the issue goes to the question of security or not is a matter for the Committee to decide.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
721 c23GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Compensation Aviation Costs Airports Fraud Identity cards Personation Staff National identity register Proof of identity Passports Travel Security
Legislation
Identity Documents Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk