Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 1 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Identity Documents Bill.


Identity Documents Bill

The part of the noble Baroness’s argument that I found conclusive was that this clause reproduces existing offences, so I relaxed after that. But my noble friend has been diligent in looking back at the 2006 Act and, indeed, as he says, it is different. If the Government are concerned—I support them entirely in this—not to undermine what has been established through case law, then I think that the Committee would be interested to learn the reasons for the changes. This clause is noticeably shorter than the section in the 2006 Act. If there has been a well-intentioned effort to compress it, quite apart from the confusion that I too have been caused, there are dangers inherent in changing the language, in however minute a fashion.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
721 c36GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Compensation Aviation Costs Airports Fraud Identity cards Personation Staff National identity register Proof of identity Passports Travel Security
Legislation
Identity Documents Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk