Proceeding contribution from Albert Owen (Labour) in the House of Commons on Friday, 3 December 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Daylight Saving Bill.
Daylight Saving Bill
The hon. Gentleman is right to put that on the record, but again he is enhancing my argument in favour of the Bill. The National Farmers Union of Scotland was very much against the proposal in the '60s and '70s, but it now wants a study because it believes that there could be overall benefits. That is a huge move on the part of an organisation that in many ways is slow to change its policies. There are, of course, other arguments used by opponents of the Bill. One is that they would feel less British, which I mentioned in an earlier intervention. I am an ex-seafarer. I know how important GMT is to the world. However, that would remain exactly the same, and for the months of March to October we move to European time anyway, so that one can be dismissed pretty easily—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 519 c1101
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Devolved matters Agriculture Costs Business Accidents Environment Energy Electricity Northern Ireland Carbon emissions Portugal Wales Roads Tourism Safety Scotland Schools Republic of Ireland Summertime Time zones Time
- Legislation
- Daylight Saving Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-10-19 16:19:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689033
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689033
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_689033