Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Marland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 December 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Climate Change: Cancun.


Climate Change: Cancun

A legally binding agreement is very difficult to achieve, as we have seen from Copenhagen and Cancun. Do we, in reality, need a legally binding agreement? Are we not better just having an agreement under which we transparently announce the requirements for verification and for reporting, and for all those sorts of issues? If they are transparent, people can see what progress is being made. Of course, we would all like a legally binding agreement, but it is rather a big ask among the 193 countries, with their different laws. One of the very valuable things about Cancun was how well team Europe did at the table, as opposed to at Copenhagen where it was viewed to have been marginalised. The European team’s endeavour was much greater at Cancun. As I said earlier, our own Secretary of State and officials who now lead team Europe were very much at the forefront of negotiations, and I know that they are determined to press for a tight strategy for these processes to come to fruition rather than just for general talking.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c442 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Climate change Developing countries International assistance International cooperation Forestry Pollution control Monitoring United Nations Climate Change Convention Conferences Greenhouse gas emissions
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk