Proceeding contribution from Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill [HL].
Energy Bill
I am grateful to the noble Lord for giving way. It was not my intention to say that there should be some kind of Napoleonic order whereby a single method should be approached. We have to recognise that there may well be differing situations or challenges. However, the point that I was trying to get across is that a consistency within that is still needed—a consistency that sometimes sacrifices and reduces complexity to make it a little more simple and straightforward. It should not be a rigid one-size-fits-all approach. I am sorry if I gave that impression because I do not think that we are more than a few millimetres apart on this issue.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 724 c39GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Cost effectiveness Conservation Competition Building regulations Housing Fees and charges Energy Insulation Heating Ministerial duties Procurement Ministers Standards Welsh Government Green deal scheme
- Legislation
- Energy Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:16:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700968
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700968
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700968