Proceeding contribution from Stephen Timms (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 February 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security.
Social Security
In opening the debate the Minister accepted that in 15 years out of 20, CPI uprating is less than RPI uprating. My point is that those serving in Afghanistan have been contributing to their pensions on the understanding that their pensions, when in payment, would be uprated in line with RPI. Now the Government are saying, ““No, they won't; they'll be uprated by a smaller amount,”” and that is a very worrying development. In view of the sympathy that the Minister has expressed for people in that position, the Government must give further thought to this matter—why war widows, who have had the person most special to them taken away, deserve to have the support that they would otherwise have been able to depend on cut as well.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 523 c1188
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Index linking Workplace pensions Social security benefits State retirement pensions Uprating Consumer prices index Average earnings
- Legislation
- Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011
- Social Security Benefits and Up-rating Order 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-15 12:52:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717790
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717790
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717790