Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill [HL].


Energy Bill [HL]

I am extremely grateful to my noble friend Lady Northover for the care with which she has replied to this amendment. I have no doubt whatever that the industry will wish to study very carefully what she has just said. I have entirely accepted the case, and I think the industry accepts the case, that there is a need for the authorities to intervene. Our problem is that that might happen when the companies’ assets and liabilities appear to be in balance but someone has thought it unlikely that they will be unable to pay their debts in the future. This seems to me and to others to be an uncertain test. It would behove the Government to try to find some alternative form of words that would allay the undoubted feeling of insecurity and unnecessary risk that the companies are running under the process of the Bill. However, as I made clear last week to my noble friend Lord Marland, it is not my intention to divide the House on this amendment but to make sure that the arguments are on the record and can be referred to in another place if that appears to Members of another place to be appropriate. Having said that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 13 withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c153 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Companies Conservation Accidents Crown lands and estates Housing Licensing Energy Energy supply Insolvency Oil Meters Private rented housing Training Renewable energy
Legislation
Energy Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk