Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Oxburgh (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill [HL].


Energy Bill [HL]

My Lords, the amendment certainly addresses an extremely important point. I conclude from the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, that the issue involves three separate elements: the Government's North Sea renewable strategy; investor confidence; and the behaviour of the Crown Estate. Unless the problem is addressed, we may be dealing with simply a matter of encouraging investment in the North Sea but of making it possible. Now is not a good time to raise money for renewables or anything else, and this could be the last straw when it comes to investment companies looking for where to put their money. Anyone observing the behaviour of the Crown Estate in recent years cannot be anything other than impressed by the vigour with which it is pursuing the objectives that must have been imposed by its master the Treasury. To describe the Crown Estate as hard-nosed might be an understatement. Indeed, it does not have responsibility for delivering the Government’s renewable North Sea strategy. Without some clear statement, ideally in the form of a statutory instrument of some kind as suggested by the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, or some comparably sure investable assurance, we will not see this going ahead.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c156 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Companies Conservation Accidents Crown lands and estates Housing Licensing Energy Energy supply Insolvency Oil Meters Private rented housing Training Renewable energy
Legislation
Energy Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk