Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Leslie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [Lords].


Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [Lords]

It has been dropped, and that is indeed something which we should come back to at another point. This time, on Report, we thought, ““Let's look as strategically as anybody could possibly want to,”” and having a growth mandate—a responsibility for growth and employment—and assessing the impact of Treasury policy seemed quite unobjectionable, at least to me when tabling the amendment. This time, on Report, we felt we should look at this as strategically as anybody could wish. Having this growth mandate—this responsibility for growth and employment and assessment of the impact of Treasury policy—seemed quite unobjectionable, at least when I tabled the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
525 c882 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Audit Budgets Fiscal policy Economic growth Powers Public expenditure National Audit Office Public finance Treasury Social policy Office for Budget Responsibility
Legislation
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk