Proceeding contribution from William Cash (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [Lords].
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [Lords]
May we park that matter for now, without in any way undermining the hon. Gentleman's main point about judicial authority? What he said in the Public Bill Committee was completely right—if we impose a statutory duty, we have to accept that the courts will adjudicate. That is important enough, but how would the hon. Gentleman reconcile clause 6(3), which states:"““The Office must, in the performance of its duty…act consistently with any guidance””" under the charter with, for example, European directives that will emerge under the 2020 strategy? Under his proposals, which would prevail?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 525 c886
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Audit Budgets Fiscal policy Economic growth Powers Public expenditure National Audit Office Public finance Treasury Social policy Office for Budget Responsibility
- Legislation
- Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:27:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_729532
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_729532
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_729532