Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dubs (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Public Bodies Bill [HL].


Public Bodies Bill [HL]

My Lords, the Minister promised us a consultation document when we debated this in Committee, and we have to welcome the consultation document even if we cannot resist saying, ““Decide first and consult afterwards””. I suppose if the Minister says that the consultation will be on the detail, that is fair enough. Since we last debated this issue, I have had a chance to talk to people who know a bit about Citizens Advice and trading standards, and there is a lot of concern as to whether trading standards will be able to manage it, partly because of the cuts in resources to local government and partly because of the question of how trading standards people somewhere in a town such as Carlisle manage to deal with a complaint against British Airways or some other large organisation. Are they well enough geared to take on some of the big boys when they are a small trading standards body in a moderately sized town in the north of England? The balance is not the same as it would be between the Competition Commission and British Airways or between the OFT and British Airways. However, I am most concerned about the central issue. Of course I welcome the merger of the OFT and part of the Competition Commission, although I am worried about the other parts. I wonder how the process will work. Certainly there will be a detailed input into the consultation process from people who know a lot about it, but what chance will Parliament have to look at the results of the consultation? What chance will we have to influence the new body through legislation? I agree entirely with my noble friend Lady Kingsmill when she said it ought to have legislation of its own. After all, these bodies were set up through primary legislation. The issues are large enough and important enough to merit a proper debate, with the chance for us to amend the legislation and use the experience that we have, together with the result of the consultation, to see how we can make it better. As I understand it—I hope I am wrong—the Government will simply consult, although they might publish the results of the consultation, and then the legislation will happen through an order that will be unamendable. I fear that Parliament will not be able to play its part and we shall lose some of the benefits of the process that primary legislation gives us.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c988-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Consumers Administration of justice BBC Closures Competition Competition Commission Finance Donors Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Libraries Ministerial powers Protection Organs Public bodies Mergers Passengers Office of Fair Trading Non-departmental public bodies Ofcom National parks National park authorities Scotland Standards Tribunals Young offenders Transport Wales Welsh language Research Television S4C Youth justice Broads Authority Civil Justice Council Human Tissue Authority National Archives Youth Justice Board Passenger Focus Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council Advisory Council on Public Records Advisory Council on National Records and Archives Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
Legislation
Public Bodies Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk