Proceeding contribution from Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 29 March 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Justice: Civil Litigation Reform.
Justice: Civil Litigation Reform
My Lords, first, in the light of what has been said, I declare an interest as the chair of a health trust. I have a good deal of sympathy with what has been said both on that front and about mediation. Secondly, I declare my solidarity with those on both Front Benches as they seem to agree that the underlying issue is access to justice. That means looking at the small print alongside the proposals for legal aid. I have two, perhaps three, questions. First, do these proposals relate only to the civil courts or to other bodies that are, in effect, part of civil justice—namely, employment tribunals, land tribunals and others? Secondly, do they apply in any way to the great raft of tribunals that involve citizen v state and have not normally been seen as civil justice? Thirdly, how many people have recourse to the civil courts and how many people have recourse to tribunals?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 726 c1113
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Related items
- Subjects
- Damages Debts Civil proceedings County courts Legal profession Fees and charges Jurisdiction Insurance Legal costs Internet Personal injury Public consultation Negligence Government responses Conditional fee agreements Expert evidence High Court Small claims Civil Litigation Costs Review Mediation
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:36:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_731857
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_731857
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_731857