Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 April 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.


Postal Services Bill

My Lords, I am most grateful to my noble friend for his clarification. I hope that I can reassure him that under the current regime, under the Postal Services Act 2000, any operators providing services within the scope of the universal service that have significant turnover are obliged to contribute to the costs. That will be the case under this Bill as well. The debate that we have heard today, for which I thank noble Lords on all sides for their helpful and knowledgeable contributions, demonstrates that a case can be made to move the access regime in either direction. However, I strongly believe that the provisions in the Bill set the right framework for access—one that supports competition but not at the expense of the universal service. I am of the firm view that Clauses 37 and 48 strike the right balance and, when combined with other powers in the Bill, give Ofcom the tools to ensure a better and more effective access regime. I hope, therefore, that after this rather lengthy explanation, the noble Lord will feel able to withdraw his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c1767-8 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Contracts Devolved matters Competition Finance Insolvency Privatisation Workplace pensions Staff Post offices Prices Pension funds Postal services Parcels Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Postage stamps Reform Wales Surcharges Rural areas Royal Mail Universal service obligation Operating costs British Postal Museum and Archive
Legislation
Postal Services Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk