Proceeding contribution from Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 April 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.
Postal Services Bill
My Lords, I suspect that everything that needs to be said has been said already and I do not want to fall into the trap of saying ““but not by everyone””. There is a common thread relating to heritage. I think that keeping the Queen’s head on stamps would be a reasonable tribute as we come up to her Diamond Jubilee. An amendment on that matter was the only amendment passed in the other place, and I look forward to hearing a confirmation of that. Other noble Lords have eloquently stressed the importance of the archive. When companies are privatised, that poses a real threat to their records, and I witnessed what happened to British Telecom’s archive and heritage. Therefore, I, too, look forward to the Minister’s response.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 726 c1809
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Devolved matters Competition Finance Insolvency Privatisation Workplace pensions Staff Post offices Prices Pension funds Postal services Parcels Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Postage stamps Reform Wales Surcharges Rural areas Royal Mail Universal service obligation Operating costs British Postal Museum and Archive
- Legislation
- Postal Services Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:34:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_734848
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_734848
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_734848