Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 April 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.


Postal Services Bill

I intended no criticism of the individuals in Postcomm. We need to remember that regulators have only a limited amount of independence. We are inclined to talk as though they had a rather larger amount of independence than they actually have. When I look at the 2000 Act and think about the policy intentions behind it and the interpretation of them, I am not entirely surprised that Postcomm got itself into what it admits is a very difficult position. In any evaluation of how the present situation comes about, we have to remember—and that is exactly why I intervened on Schedule 9—that the Government of the day are in the final analysis the accountable body and Parliament with it, and the regulator is trying to carry out their wishes as it interprets them, with a certain amount of independence, but only a certain amount.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c1821 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Contracts Devolved matters Competition Finance Insolvency Privatisation Workplace pensions Staff Post offices Prices Pension funds Postal services Parcels Ofcom Postal Services Commission Post Office Postage stamps Reform Wales Surcharges Rural areas Royal Mail Universal service obligation Operating costs British Postal Museum and Archive
Legislation
Postal Services Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk