Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hughes of Stretford (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.
Education Bill
First, would the noble Baroness not agree that, in that situation, most of us would expect an independent arbitration of that decision? Secondly, does she think that it is right that, in the event that the governing body thinks again and decides to stick with its original decision, which is thought to be unreasonable, it can then pay its way out of that situation instead of having to give the child redress and accept the child back into school? Is that a good example of what we should be showing children?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c18GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Bullying Discipline Appeals Assets Conduct Homosexuality Education General Teaching Council Northern Ireland Parents Pupil exclusions Pupils Scotland Registration Schools Teachers Special educational needs Wales
- Legislation
- Education Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:15:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756200
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756200
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756200