Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Elton (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.


Education Bill

May I ask a couple of questions of my noble friend? First, he referred throughout to permanent exclusion. The word ““permanent”” does not seem to appear in the text of the legislation. The direction was given to the Secretary of State in setting out the regulations, leaving it open to him to decide what sort of an exclusion the panel might make a judgment on. I assume there are important administrative reasons to minimise the appeals as well as practical ones. If it is an exclusion for a week or a fortnight, it will be over before the appeal is heard. For permanent exclusion, that is a different matter. Secondly, I would like to ask the question the noble Earl, Lord Listowel, was expected to ask and did not: what is to become of pupils excluded from a PRU, particularly if there is only one PRU available in an area? Thirdly, I am puzzled not to have received representations—I may be unique in this—from the head teachers’ organisations and I wondered whether they had expressed a view.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c24GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Bullying Discipline Appeals Assets Conduct Homosexuality Education General Teaching Council Northern Ireland Parents Pupil exclusions Pupils Scotland Registration Schools Teachers Special educational needs Wales
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk