Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.


Education Bill

Can I press the Minister on one point, following on from the noble Lord, Lord Peston, who drew attention to the philosophical difficulty of new subsection (6)? I notice the review panel will have the discretion to impose a fine for an adjustment in budget but it is not a requirement that the review panel would do so. I am puzzled as to how a review panel is going to decide between one case and another and on what basis. You almost then have the prospect of review panels grading the substance of their requirement that a responsible body review it according to a scale of fines. This strikes me as odd. It is in the subjunctive—that the review panel, "““may, in prescribed circumstances, order an adjustment””—" and I wonder whether the Minister would expand a little more on what the ““may”” represents.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c24-5GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Bullying Discipline Appeals Assets Conduct Homosexuality Education General Teaching Council Northern Ireland Parents Pupil exclusions Pupils Scotland Registration Schools Teachers Special educational needs Wales
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk