Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.


Education Bill

65A: Clause 8, page 13, leave out lines 32 to 34 65B: Clause 8, page 13, line 42, at end insert— ““Interim prohibition orders 2A (1) Regulations under paragraph 1 may make provision for the Secretary of State to make an interim prohibition order, pending the Secretary of State’s final decision under section 141B(2). (2) Regulations about interim prohibition orders must provide that an interim prohibition order may be made only if the Secretary of State considers that it is necessary in the public interest to do so. (3) Regulations about interim prohibition orders must provide that the Secretary of State must review an interim prohibition order— (a) within six months of the order being made, and (b) within each subsequent six month period, if the person to whom the order relates makes an application to the Secretary of State for such a review.”” 65C: Clause 8, page 14, line 27, leave out ““2(3)”” and insert ““2A”” Amendments 65A to 65C agreed. Clause 8, as amended, agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c68GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Bullying Discipline Appeals Assets Conduct Homosexuality Education General Teaching Council Northern Ireland Parents Pupil exclusions Pupils Scotland Registration Schools Teachers Special educational needs Wales
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk