Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Earl Attlee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.

Localism Bill

My Lords, the noble Lord poses a good question that will help to illustrate the situation. He describes a situation where the planning application is for more houses than are provided for in the local development plan. The extra money arising from the NHB and the CIL from those houses can be taken into consideration if it is used in relation to those extra houses. If the money is going to enhance a railway station that would support those extra houses, it can be taken into consideration, but if it is to support perhaps a swimming pool on the other side of town, it cannot be taken into consideration because it is not relevant to the application.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c1422 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disability Appeals Compulsory purchase Design Housing Land Greater London Infrastructure Homelessness Learning disability Landlords Local government Low incomes Planning permission Property transfer Planning Ombudsman Property development Mayor of London Private rented housing Social rented housing Renewable energy Tenants Tenancy agreements Wind power Travellers Regeneration London Development Agency Homes and Communities Agency Tenant Services Authority Community infrastructure levy Housing Ombudsman Service
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk