Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

My Lords, with respect, I find myself more in agreement with my noble friend Lord Whitty than with my noble friend Lord Judd. I am bound to say that that is unusual. My advice is that the normal arrangement is that parties bear their own costs in an appeal. I have heard nothing which suggests that we should disrupt that arrangement whether in respect of wind farms or anything else. If we go down that path, we shall have a two-tier system whereby in some circumstances people will bear their own costs whereas in others, because they happen to be wealthier, they will have different arrangements. That seems a rather odd proposition. However, I particularly wanted to—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c1428 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disability Appeals Compulsory purchase Design Housing Land Greater London Infrastructure Homelessness Learning disability Landlords Local government Low incomes Planning permission Property transfer Planning Ombudsman Property development Mayor of London Private rented housing Social rented housing Renewable energy Tenants Tenancy agreements Wind power Travellers Regeneration London Development Agency Homes and Communities Agency Tenant Services Authority Community infrastructure levy Housing Ombudsman Service
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk