Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
I am very grateful to the Minister for that response. She is absolutely right that on big projects, these things should be taken into account in the whole, but I still have a concern about something falling between two stools, if that is the right analogy. Perhaps I can have a discussion with her between now and Report, or read Hansard. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 170CG withdrawn. Amendments 170CH to 170CK not moved. Clause 125 agreed. Amendment 170CL Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c1446
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Disability Appeals Compulsory purchase Design Housing Land Greater London Infrastructure Homelessness Learning disability Landlords Local government Low incomes Planning permission Property transfer Planning Ombudsman Property development Mayor of London Private rented housing Social rented housing Renewable energy Tenants Tenancy agreements Wind power Travellers Regeneration London Development Agency Homes and Communities Agency Tenant Services Authority Community infrastructure levy Housing Ombudsman Service
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:37:59 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764590
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764590
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764590