Proceeding contribution from Graham Stuart (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education Bill.
Education Bill
Conservative Members have found that artificial targets led to precisely the kind of mechanistic, cost-of-business approach that my hon. Friend speaks about so well. That is why we set up a body of experts like Ofqual to work within a framework, also established, of different awarding bodies wherein together they come up with the right approach. I am not sure that it is necessarily right to set a percentage. If there were a consistent period in which the awarding bodies showed themselves to be careless, or if we found on international comparison that ours were not up to scratch compared with those elsewhere—whatever the aspiration of the Japanese examination system, I doubt that it delivers 100% accuracy in all exams—it would be better if we trusted Ofqual to work with them without necessarily bringing more bureaucratic sanctions into the process. Given the terms of subsection (5) of the new clause, there seems to be little incentive for Ofqual to control the costs of this, and it may simply add further to the expense of our qualifications system.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 535 c607
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Assessments Admissions Conduct Cooperation Governing bodies Inspections Protection Privacy Vetting Schools Teachers Rights of accused Ofqual
- Legislation
- Education Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:56:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784758
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784758
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784758