Proceeding contribution from Nick Gibb (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education Bill.
Education Bill
What I will put on the record are the words used in paragraph 3.1 of the code, which states that admission authorities must where necessary revise their admission arrangements as quickly as possible, and no later than 15 April, following the decisions to give effect to the adjudicator's decision. It goes on:"ββAn Adjudicator's determination is binding and enforceable.ββ" I will come back to that point when I address the hon. Gentleman's amendments in more detail. On Ofqual, the power to fine would be used only where that was the most proportionate response to an incident of non-compliance with its conditions. As I have said, Ofqual will consult on the use of its power and will publish a full statement as part of its qualifications regulatory framework setting out how and under what circumstances the power will be used. That will make clear Ofqual's expectation that only serious or persistent breaches will lead to a fine. Of course, it will allow 12 weeks for responses to that consultation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 535 c628
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Assessments Admissions Conduct Cooperation Governing bodies Inspections Protection Privacy Vetting Schools Teachers Rights of accused Ofqual
- Legislation
- Education Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:55:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784807
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784807
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784807