Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 March 2012. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2012.


Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2012

My Lords, these orders are relatively straightforward. I have two questions for the Minister. First, I note with interest that in the first consultation, only 52 per cent of all levy-paying employers were in favour, and in the other one, only 59 per cent of the levy-payers were in favour, although in each case they represented slightly more of the estimated payments. Is the noble Baroness satisfied that that is sufficient approval for these proposals? Secondly, there are quite detailed proposals for minimising the impact of these levies on small businesses. The various Explanatory Statements simply state what the proposals are regarding the exemption for small businesses, which the noble Baroness explained in her opening remarks. Is she satisfied that those exemptions go far enough?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c95GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Appeals Construction Women Equality Fees and charges Exemptions Industry Industrial training boards Engineering Training Small businesses CITB Engineering Construction Industry Training Board
Legislation
Industrial Training Levy (Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2012
Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Industry Training Board) Order 2012
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk