Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
My Lords, I would like to add to the question well raised by the previous speaker and ask the Minister to go one step further. I reread the wording of the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Owen, and I am not entirely clear what the effect would be if, when the Tribunal's detailed reasons were made available, the Government then decided to appeal that decision. Would that put an end to the noble Lord's attempt to have the risk register available before we finalise the Bill or would it mean, as I think from the wording that it would, that the matter was at an end and we would proceed to Third Reading?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 736 c651
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Accountability Charities Directors Civil servants Ancillary staff Advocacy Equality Health Health services Finance Fees and charges Health Protection Agency Health professions NHS Staff Registration Standards Training Reform VAT Research Accident and emergency departments Risk assessment NHS Commissioning Board Public Health England Clinical commissioning groups Healthcare assistants
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:06:17 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_819079
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_819079
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_819079