Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
I do not disagree with what my hon. Friend says. However, the special administration in respect of MF Global—which, as I have said, will be high profile in years to come—seems to be considerably better organised in every other jurisdiction than it is in the UK. That is doing great damage to the reputation of the UK as a destination for financial services. Following the failure of the firms to which I have referred, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme has announced it will need to raise an additional £60 million in the investment intermediation sub-class, resulting in rising costs for firms in that category, and in the coming year both MF Global and Arch Cru will, I fear, generate further liabilities of some £600 million or more.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 543 c758
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Accountability Debts Banks Credit Advisory services Bank of England Fees and charges Financial services Financial institutions Interest rates Public appointments Mortgages Loans Office of Fair Trading Standards Regulation Repayments Trading standards Pre-payment Financial Policy Committee Financial Conduct Authority Prudential Regulation Authority Money Advice Service
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2010-12 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:57:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_824722
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_824722
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_824722