Proceeding contribution from Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 2 December 2014. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill.

Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill

I confess that I am by no means convinced of the legality of what is being suggested under temporary exclusion orders, which will, no doubt, be known in due course as TEOs, given our enthusiasm for acronyms. What is the position of someone who declines to accept conditions of return and who is not subject to deportation by the country in which they temporarily finds themselves? Are they not de facto stateless in such circumstances?

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 589 c211
Session: 2014-15
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Counter-terrorism Crime prevention Aviation Community relations British overseas territories citizenship Electronic surveillance Intelligence services Immigration International cooperation Internet Higher education Import controls Hostage taking Abduction Local government National security Payments Public bodies Railways Naturalisation Location Telecommunications Screening Transport Travel restrictions Shipping Travel requirements Special Immigration Appeals Commission Radicalism Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Temporary exclusion orders
Legislation: Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014; Counter-terrorism and Security Bill 2014-15
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill

Secondary information

Librarians' tools