Proceeding contribution from Dan Tomlinson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 1 July 2026. It occurred during Debate on bill on Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill.
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill
There is a very sensible policy rationale when it comes to the electricity generator levy, which I think is the clause the hon. Member is referring to. We want to ensure that the ending of the EGL and the future decisions made on it are made in the light of the decisions that will be made on the wholesale contracts for difference, which, as I have said, are coming forward. It would not have been the right decision to pick a future end date without considering how it would interact with the decisions that the Government will make and will be consulting on later this year on the detail of the wholesale contracts for difference.
I hope that that has responded to many, if not all, of the points that have been raised by Opposition Members. I encourage Members to support the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Bill accordingly read a Second time.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 788 c955
- Session
- 2026-27
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Employment Electricity generation Energy supply Excise duties Large goods vehicles Fuels Protection Natural gas Prices Tax rates and bands Uprating Mileage allowances
- Legislation
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill 2026-27
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-02 10:07:00 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-07-01/26070156000125
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-07-01/26070156000125
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-07-01/26070156000125