Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 March 2019. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offensive Weapons Bill.


Offensive Weapons Bill

It comes back to the noble Baroness’s point about consultation. In developing the guidance, we must and will engage with business and organisations such as the BRC. The intention is that it will be developed with them. We could have a circular argument here about whether things should be directly specified in the Bill or how helpful the guidance will be in helping retailers and the criminal justice system, but guidance generally will help the Government keep pace with developments.

Amendment 86 is similar to Amendment 81 and again seeks to require the Secretary of State to issue guidance. We have already debated government Amendment 106, which will enable the Secretary of State, Scottish Ministers and the Northern Ireland Justice Department to issue statutory guidance on certain parts of the Bill, including those dealing with offences of remote sale and delivery of knives. We intend that there should be guidance to retailers on what items are prohibited from dispatch to residential premises or a locker under Clause 18. I think the government amendment is adequate to cover this.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
796 c457 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Compensation Armed forces Agriculture Age Antiques Delivery services Licensing Gun sports Film Forestry Equipment Internet Knives Medical examinations Northern Ireland Public places Public consultation Offensive weapons Scotland Sales Young people Theatre Sikhs Food technology Rifles Tools UK Border Force Archery Corrosive substances Knife crime prevention orders
Legislation
Offensive Weapons Bill 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk