Proceeding contribution from Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 8 July 2019. It occurred during Debate on bill on Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill.
Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill
Why did it rule it out? I should have asked earlier. My noble friend Lady Smith chastised me earlier for being late to the issue. Why was it not considered? Why was it ruled out at such an early stage, without any costing, as the alternative?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 798 c1681
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Contracts Costs Conservation Construction Buildings Cultural heritage Apprentices Archives Education Infrastructure Facilities Planning Location Staff Palace of Westminster Small businesses Repairs and maintenance Tourism Treasury Dispute resolution Parliamentary Works Estimates Commission Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body
- Legislation
- Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill 2017-19
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2019-07-25 11:53:33 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-07-08/19070827000097
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-07-08/19070827000097
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-07-08/19070827000097