Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,385 results for subject:Sanctions

Session X
2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Well, I shall respond, if I am so invited. I shall respond to one point. The noble Baroness has misunderstood the expression "financial sanctions", but there are other sanctions to be made, so her whole argument against my position falls down.

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c909
House
House of Lords

That the House do not insist on its Amendment 2, to which the Commons have disagreed, and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 2A in lieu and their consequential Amendment 2B— 2A: Page 12, line 45, at end insert the following new Clause:- "Parliamentary procedure: regulations imposing work-related...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c903
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we know that there are ways of making a point when somebody wants to. We note that the noble Lord did not take the opportunity to do that. There will be other opportunities to explore that situation. The noble Lord, Lord Freud, prayed in aid John Grogan and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c913-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my surprise, in view of what the noble Lord, Lord Freud, has said, is that he has not pressed his amendment again. Will he explain to his e-mail recipients why he has not done so, because I do not believe that the Bill would have been lost? During...

Member
Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c910-1
House
House of Lords

I do not think that the position of the noble Lord, Lord Freud, is being lost in this; the decision has been postponed. He might be upset about that but he may find himself in a position to do something about it in the not-too-distant future. After all, as my...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c911-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this discussion. The noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, is right to analyse what is proposed for the sanctions regime for work-related activity: it flows that it will be broadly consistent with the Gregg model. The Secretary of State’s letter to...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c912-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I remind both the Minister and the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, that, in a debate of this sort, leave can only be given to speak again on a material point in my noble friend’s speech. He did not mention childcare tax credits at all.

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c913
House
House of Lords

Welfare Reform Bill. Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Lords amendment 2 not insisted on and Commons amendment 2A in lieu and consequential amendment 2B agreed to.

Department
Department for Work and Pensions; Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c903-14
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c909
House
House of Lords

I am sure that the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, knows that my noble friend cannot stand up again at this stage in the Bill’s proceedings.

Member
Baroness Morris of Bolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c909
House
House of Lords

I wanted the noble Lord to stand up before I sat down, which I shall if he wishes to speak. Therefore, he has plenty of—how shall I put it?—formal opportunity to respond to the question that I put to him. I note that he does not.

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c909
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord either does not know, does not care or refuses to make the commitment that would really matter to lone parents, should there be a change of Administration.

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c909
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is with some surprise that I see this amendment in lieu has come back from another place because the arguments have been firmly on the side of the original Lords amendment. John Grogan MP—a Member on the government Benches in another place—said: ""This proposal is mean-spirited. It...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c907-8
House
House of Lords

I take exception to any suggestion that the views of the government Bench are part of a political game. The noble Lord, Lord Freud, is a fairly late entrant to the discussions on lone parents. Members on the Liberal Democrat and Labour Benches have fought the corner of lone-parent poverty...

Member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c908-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, during the Commons’ consideration of Lords amendments in the other place, honourable Members accepted all the amendments made in your Lordships’ House with the exception of Amendment 2. This amendment would have placed a requirement in primary legislation that financial sanctions should not be imposed on a single...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
714 c903-7
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we discuss policy frequently with a wide range of stakeholders, including the TUC. I chair a regular meeting with TUC leaders as part of this dialogue. We agree on a great many issues, especially the need to achieve a just, two-state solution. As part of this dialogue, we have made very clear the Government’s stance on boycotts.
Answered by
Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c795
House
House of Lords
Would my noble friend take note of the fact that the TUC, in pursuing the difficult issue of goods produced in what we all know to be— It is not mandatory to give way to a privy counsellor. The TUC, in pursuing the difficult issue of goods produced in what we all know to be illegal settlements, which is what the boycott demand is all about, has begun holding informal talks— It is important that I am accurate. I wish noble Lords opposite would be more civilised and listen for a minute. The boycott demand is all about goods produced in illegal settlements. The TUC has begun holding informal talks, both with Histadrut, the Israeli trade union centre, and with the PGFTU, which is its rough parallel in Palestine. These talks cover, inter alia, the interests of the Palestinian workers in the area of the illegal settlements.
Asked by
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c795-6
House
House of Lords
I thank the Minister for her response and welcome her views. Does she agree that British unions display an unbalanced fixation in calling for boycotts of Israel in the light of extensive human rights violations and occupations, including security fences, in other countries, such as Sri Lanka, Saudi Arabia, Morocco in relation to Western Sahara, Iran and northern Cyprus, which do not elicit such calls?
Asked by
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c795
House
House of Lords
I thank the noble Baroness. I reiterate that the United Kingdom believes that disinvestment, sanctions and boycotts directed at Israel would be counterproductive. Isolation of Israel would advance neither Britain’s influence nor, most important, the prospects of peace in the Middle East. We continue to focus on the wider perspective, which is to continue to strive towards a comprehensive peace process in the Middle East. That includes supporting the United States in its efforts now to launch that process.
Answered by
Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c795
House
House of Lords
My Lords, settlement activity is illegal. It prejudges peace talks and must be halted immediately. This includes, of course, in east Jerusalem, to which the noble Lord alluded. Israel is committed through the road map and the Annapolis conference to freeze all settlement activity, as the noble Lord suggests, and immediately to dismantle settlement outposts erected since March 2001. We raise this issue consistently with the Israeli Government. The Prime Minister stressed it during his meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu in August and several times in further conversations.
Answered by
Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c796
House
House of Lords