Search Results

1-20 of 109 results for askedby:"Norman Baker"

Show detailed: On Off

Results: 10 20 50 100

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many parents appeared in court in relation to their children's unauthorised absence from school in (a) England and (b) East Sussex in each of the last 10 years.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Children, Schools and Families

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

15 December 2009

For answer on

5 January 2010

Answered on

2 February 2010

Information from the Ministry of Justice court proceedings database on the number of parents proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences relating to failing to secure their child's regular school attendance in the Sussex police force area and England, for the years 2001 to 2007 can be viewed in the following table. Prior to 2001 these offences cannot be separately identified.

Number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences relating to 'failing to attend school¹ in Sussex police force area (pfa), and England, 2001-07²,³
	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007
Sussex (pfa)	13	6	17	10	9	5	13
England	1,961	3,163	3,849	4,442	4,648	5,999	7,745
¹ Includes the following:
(i) Failure to secure regular attendance at school. (Education Act 1996 S.444 (1)(8)).
(ii) Parent knows that their child is failing to attend school regularly and fails without reasonable justification to cause him or her to attend school. (Education Act 1996 S.444(8)(1a)(8a) added by Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000 S.72).
² The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence, for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
³ Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice. [Ref: IOS 593-09]

Court proceedings data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.These data are on the principal offence basis. The figures given in the table on court proceedings relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offence for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences, the offence selected is the one for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.These data are a further breakdown of that published in the Criminal Statistics, Supplementary Volumes for England and Wales for the years 2001 to 2007.Our commitment as set out in the Children's Plan is to reduce the level of persistent absence so that by 2011 no local authority will have more than five per cent of its secondary pupils as persistent absentees. Although the number of prosecutions in Sussex was the same in 2007 as in 2001, there has been an increase of 5,784 prosecutions in England over the same period, which is nearly four times as many than in 2001. This could be attributed to local authorities making more use of their powers to improve attendance in school. Recent years have seen increased use of parental responsibility measures such as parenting orders and parenting contracts as well as prosecutions.

Date

2 February 2010

Reference

505 c306-7W; 308463

House

House of Commons

Data Protection: Prosecutions

To ask the Solicitor-General what criteria are followed by the Director of Public Prosecutions in deciding whether to give his consent pursuant to section 60 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to a prosecution for a non-notification offence under that Act.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Solicitor General

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

25 June 2007

Reference

144334; 462 c4W

House

House of Commons

Data Protection: Prosecutions

To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many prosecutions against data controllers for failure to notify the Information Commissioner of the processing of personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998 were brought in each year since the coming into force of that Act.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Justice

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

25 June 2007

Reference

144330; 462 c337W

House

House of Commons

Data Protection: Prosecutions

To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many prosecutions for non-notification of the processing of personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998 have been brought by (a) the Information Commissioner, (b) the Director of Public Prosecutions and (c) others with the consent of the Director of...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Justice

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

25 June 2007

Reference

144331; 462 c337W

House

House of Commons

Data Protection: Prosecutions

To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice (1) how many prosecutions for non-notification of the processing of personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998 have resulted in convictions; and what penalty was imposed in each case in which no further proceedings are active;

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Justice

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

25 June 2007

Reference

144332; 462 c338W

House

House of Commons

Data Protection: Prosecutions

To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many requests for prosecutions against data controllers for failure to notify the Information Commissioner of the processing of personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998 have been made to (a) the Information Commissioner and (b) the Director of Public...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Ministry of Justice

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

25 June 2007

Reference

144333; 462 c338W

House

House of Commons

R v. Lindis Percy (Prosecution Costs)

To ask the Solicitor-General how much the prosecution in the case of R v Lindis Percy at Harrogate Magistrates Court on 18, 19 and 21 September 2006 is estimated to have cost in public funds.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Solicitor General

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 October 2006

Reference

450 c1373W;450 c1379W; 94610

House

House of Commons

Countryside and Rights of Way Act

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) (i) prosecutions and (ii) convictions have taken place and (b) orders have been made under section 14 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Home Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

5 December 2005

Reference

440 c974W;440 c974W; 31839

House

House of Commons

Nuclear Inspectorate

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment has been made of the effectiveness of fines levied by the Nuclear Inspectorate on polluters in preventing (a) further incidences of pollution by the polluters and (b) incidences of pollution from others who have not previously polluted; what...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department of Trade and Industry

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

28 November 2005

Reference

440 c105-6W;440 c105-6W; 27793

House

House of Commons

Nuclear Inspectorate

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many (a) complaints, (b) court actions and (c) fines there have been in each year since 1995 against the nuclear industry for problems related to (i) odours, (ii) water pollution, (iii) air pollution and (iv) human health impact, (A)...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

22 November 2005

Reference

27794; 439 c1889-90W;439 c1890W

House

House of Commons

Fisheries

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many incidents in the last year for which figures are available of (a) marine pollution and (b) coastal pollution have resulted in (i) court actions and (ii) fines; and what the (A) nature and (B) level of...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

8 November 2005

For answer on

10 November 2005

Answered on

21 November 2005

Information is not held in this form.The Department's Sea Fisheries Inspectorate carried out a prosecution on behalf of DEFRA in 2004 following deposits of dredged material into the sea without the required licence under the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985 for the deposit of substances and articles in the sea. One of the joint defendants was fined £40,000 and the other £20,000.The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) of the Department for Transport have carried out one prosecution this year following dumping of garbage including sleeping bags, polystyrene and plastic bags into the sea under the Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution by Garbage) Regulations 1998. The defendant was fined £2,000.The Maritime and Coastguard Agency have carried out two prosecutions this year following breaches of the UK maritime pollution legislation. One defendant was fined £20,000 and £11,344 costs and the other defendant was fined £5,000 and £4,379.70 costs.The MCA sponsor the Advisory Committee for the Protection of the Sea to produce an annual survey of reported discharges attributed to vessels and offshore oil and gas installations. The report for 2004 records 10 successful prosecutions for oil pollution offences. Total fines imposed by the competent authorities which included ports and harbours amounted to £122,200, providing a mean value of £12,200.The Environment Agency (who have regulatory powers in coastal waters up to three miles offshore) have recorded 11 minor ““marine”” incidents in 2004 for which no formal enforcement action was taken.The Department of Trade and Industry carried out a prosecution this year following an unpermitted discharge of an offshore chemical under the Offshore Chemicals Regulations 2002. The offshore platform operator was fined £3,000 in a Scottish Court.

Date

21 November 2005

Reference

439 c1530W;439 c1534W; 27830

House

House of Commons

PROSECUTION OF THE GUNNS 20

That this House condemns the action by the Australian woodchip company Gunns to sue 20 environmental groups, campaigners and politicians who have domestically opposed its role in the logging of old growth forests in Tasmania; believes this action is an attack on basic civil liberties and freedom of speech; condemns...

Primary sponsor

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Type

Early day motions

Date

14 July 2005

Reference

598

House

House of Commons

Packaging Regulations

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many prosecutions have been instigated under the packaging (essential requirements) regulations 2003; and what the results have been.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department of Trade and Industry

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

6 June 2005

Reference

1495; 434 c309W;434 c311W

House

House of Commons

Dept of Trade and Industry

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, how many prosecutions of BNFL have occurred since 1st May 1997excluding ongoing cases; on what date; and for what offence.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department of Trade and Industry

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

10 March 2005

For answer on

22 March 2005

Answered on

22 March 2005

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many prosecutions of BNFL have occurred since 1 May 1997 excluding ongoing cases; on what date; and for what offence. [221676] Mr. Mike O'Brien: BNFL has been subject to the following prosecutions since 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Date of hearing Offences 26 September 1997 Discharge of Caustic Soda into River Calder at Sellafield Water Resources Act 1991 sections 85 (i) and 85 (vi) Environmental Protection Act 1990 sections 6 (i), 23 (i) and 23 (ii) Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975 section 4 (i) Authorisation Number AS5601 Conditions 1.1 and 1.4 2 September 1998 Solvent release into River Ribble at Springfields Failure to comply with Condition 1.4 Integrated Pollution Control Authorisation AS4494 Failure to comply with Condition 3.2 of the said authorisation 2 June 2000 Nitric Acid Spill at Sellafield Health and Safety at Work Act 1974--section 2(1) and 33(1)(a) 20 September 2000 Breach of Site Discharge Authorisation at Chapelcross Radioactive Substances Act 5 October 2000 Failing to comply with Improvement Notice (s33 HSWA) Failing to leak test radioactive source (Reg. 27 IRR '99) Failing to account for radioactive sources 2 (Reg. 28 IRR '99) 5 April 2001 Failing to register as a user of Mobile Radioactive Apparatus (s9 RSA '93)--BNFL Sellafield Failure to register radioactive material (sources) (s6 RSA '93) at Barrow Marine Terminal 6 March 2002 Contamination event--Sellafield Regulation 8, Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999 Regulation 7, Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999 Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (section 3 (1), section 33 (1)(a) and section 33 (1a) 29 March 2003 Arm injury to employee--Sellafield Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 sections 33 (1)(a) and 33 (1a) 30 January 2004 Dive Boat Incident--Sellafield Health and Safety at Work Act 1974--section 2 27 May 2004 Calder Hall--unsuitable floor Regulation 12(1) of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 Section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Date

22 March 2005

Reference

432 c670-2W; 221676

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many prosecutions resulted in (a) convictions and (b) custodial sentences in each year since 1999 for offences related to (i) water resources, (ii) flood defences, (iii) fisheries, (iv) navigation, (v) process industry regulation, (vi) radioactive substances, (vii)...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

26 November 2004

For answer on

15 December 2004

Answered on

15 December 2004

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many prosecutions resulted in (a) convictions and (b) custodial sentences in each year since 1999 for offences related to (i) water resources, (ii) flood defences, (iii) fisheries, (iv) navigation, (v) process industry regulation, (vi) radioactive substances, (vii) waste and (viii) water quality as recorded in the National Enforcement Database; and what the average fines were where custodial sentences were awarded (A) in total and (B) broken down by region. [200915] Alun Michael: The information requested is provided in the following table. Environment agency: successful prosecutions and custodial sentences, calendar years 1999 to 2004 Date of report: 29 November 2004 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Total convictions/custodial sentences 11999 2000 2001 Fisheries 0 0 27 0 22 0 Flood defence 2 0 1 0 2 0 Navigation 3 0 6 0 3 0 PIR 6 0 12 0 7 0 RAS 3 0 3 0 11 0 Water quality 177 0 219 0 234 0 Water resources 6 0 21 0 10 0 Waste 246 3 408 5 471 10 Total convictions/custodial sentences 2002 2003 22004 Fisheries 48 0 34 0 28 0 Flood defence 1 0 5 0 9 0 Navigation 15 0 32 0 20 0 PIR 3 0 5 0 1 0 RAS 1 0 3 0 2 0 Water quality 220 0 167 0 154 1 Water resources 11 0 6 0 15 0 Waste 498 4 406 7 374 7 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. 1 April to December. 2 January to October.

Date

15 December 2004

Reference

200915; 428 c1100-1W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many (a) prosecutions, (b) cautions and (c) enforcement notices there have been in each year since 1995 brought by the Drinking Water Inspectorate (i) in total and (ii) broken down by region. - Inc tables.

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

26 November 2004

For answer on

6 December 2004

Answered on

6 December 2004

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many (a) prosecutions, (b) cautions and (c) enforcement notices there have been in each year since 1995 brought by the Drinking Water Inspectorate (i) in total and (ii) broken down by region. [200709] Mr. Morley: Since 1995 the Drinking Water Inspectorate has initiated proceedings for 35 prosecutions and issued 20 Cautions. The Inspectorate has also issued 8 Enforcement Notices under section 20 of the Water Industry Act 1991. The number of prosecutions, cautions and notices are summarised as follows, by year and by region. Number of prosecutions _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Total number of prosecutions Prosecutions by Region Number 1995 2 Wales 1 -- -- West Midlands 1 1996 1 London -- 1997 4 Wales 2 -- -- West Midlands 1 -- -- South West 1 1998 9 Yorkshire and Humberside 1 -- -- Wales 3 North East 1 -- -- South East 2 -- -- West Midlands 1 -- -- North West 1 1999 9 East of England 2 -- -- South West 2 -- -- East Midlands 1 -- -- South East 2 -- -- North West 2 2000 5 South East 1 -- -- Wales 3 -- -- East of England 1 2001 3 South East 1 -- -- Wales 1 -- -- East of England 1 2002 1 Yorkshire and Humberside -- 2003 0 -- -- 2004 (To date) 1 East of England -- _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Number of cautions _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Total number of cautions Cautions by Region Number 1995 1 Wales -- 1996 0 -- -- 1997 0 -- -- 1998 2 Yorkshire and Humberside 1 -- -- South West 1 1999 0 -- -- 2000 8 South East 2 -- -- North West 4 -- -- North East 1 -- -- South West 1 2001 3 Yorkshire 2 2002 2 Yorkshire and Humberside -- 2003 3 Yorkshire and Humberside 2 -- -- Wales 1 2004 (To date) 1 South East -- _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Notices of intention to serve an Enforcement Order under s20 Water Industry Act 1991 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Total number of Notices served Notices served by Region Number 1995 0 -- -- 1996 6 East of England 1 -- -- West Midlands 1 North East 1 East/West Midlands 1 South East 2 1997 2 Yorkshire and Humberside 1 -- -- South East 1 1998 0 -- -- 1999 0 -- -- 2000 0 -- -- 2001 0 -- -- 2002 0 -- -- 2003 0 -- -- 2004 (To date) 0 -- -- _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Date

6 December 2004

Reference

200709; 428 c272-3W

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many prosecutions resulted in (a) convictions and (b) custodial sentences in each year since 1999 for offences related to (i) water resources (ii) flood defences, (iii) fisheries, (iv) navigation, (v) process industry regulation, (vi) radioactive substances, (vii)...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

14 October 2004

For answer on

18 November 2004

Answered on

18 November 2004

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many prosecutions resulted in (a) convictions and (b) custodial sentences in each year since 1999 for offences related to (i) water resources (ii) flood defences, (iii) fisheries, (iv) navigation, (v) process industry regulation, (vi) radioactive substances, (vii) waste and (viii) water quality as recorded in the National Enforcement Database; and what the average fines were where custodial sentences were awarded (A) in total and (B) broken down by region. [192317] Alun Michael: The information available is given in the following table. Environment Agency Successful Prosecutions, Calendar Years 1999-2004 Date of report: 17 November 2004 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. 1999 (April to 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 (January to December) October) Fisheries 0 27 22 48 34 28 Flood defence 2 1 2 1 5 9 Navigation 3 6 3 15 32 20 PIR 6 12 7 3 5 1 RAS 3 3 11 1 3 2 Water quality 177 219 234 220 167 154 Water Resources 6 21 10 11 6 15 Waste 246 408 471 498 406 374 _________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Date

18 November 2004

Reference

426 c2016W;426 c2022W; 192317

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

18 November 2004

Reference

426 c2015W;426 c2021W; 192318

House

House of Commons

Home Office

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many defendants have been proceeded against at magistrates courts in each year since 1997 under (a) section 1, (b) section 5, (c) section 6, (d) section 7 and (e) any section of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981; how...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Home Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

14 October 2004

For answer on

27 October 2004

Answered on

27 October 2004

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many defendants have been proceeded against at magistrates courts in each year since 1997 under (a) section 1, (b) section 5, (c) section 6, (d) section 7 and (e) any section of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981; [192325] (2) how many defendants have been proceeded against at magistrates courts in each year since 1997 under (a) section 60, (b) section 61, (c) section 62, (d) section 93 and (e) any section of the Control of Pollution Act 1974; [192326] (3) how many defendants have been proceeded against at magistrates courts in each year since 1997 under (a) section 110(2)(a), (b) section 110(2)(b), (c) section 110(2)(c), (d) section 110(4)(a), (e) section 110(4)(b) and (f) any section of the Environment Act 1995; [192327] (4) how many defendants have been proceeded against at magistrates courts in each year since 1997 under the Clean Air Act 1993. [192328] Paul Goggins: Statistics for defendants proceeded against at the magistrates' courts 1997 to 2002, for offences under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, Control of Pollution Act 1974, Environmental 1995 and the Clean Air Act 1993 are shown in the attached table. Statistics for 2003 will be published in November. Number of defendants proceeded against at the magistrates' courts for certain offences, England and Wales, 1997 to 2002 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Offence Statute 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Protection of wild birds Wildlife and 60 48 42 33 53 29 Protection of nest and eggs Countryside of wild birds Act 1981 S.1 Prohibition of certain Wildlife and 8 3 7 5 2 4 methods of killing or Countryside taking wild birds Act 1981 S.5 Sale etc of live or dead Countryside 2 3 2 4 1 -- wild birds, eggs, etc Act 1981 S.6 Registration etc of certain Countryside 2 -- 2 2 -- 2 captive birds Act 1981 S.7 Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Summary offences2 other 11 5 9 6 10 10 sections Either way offences Wildlife and -- -- 2 1 2 -- Countryside Act 1981-- other sections Control of noise on Control of 29 35 32 68 33 15 construction sites. Pollution Act 1974 S.60 Applicant failing to obtain Control of 3 1 1 -- 1 -- consent etc. to work on Pollution Act construction site, or to 1974 S.61 bring notice of other person. Operation of a loud speaker Control of 34 32 69 13 5 9 in a street Pollution Act 1974 S.62 Fail to comply with a Control of 4 3 -- -- -- -- notice, or fail to furnish Pollution Act information or false 1974 S.93 as information amended by Environment Act 1995 Sch 19 para 1(3) Summary Pollution Offences2 Control of -- -- -- -- -- -- Pollution Act 1974-- other sections Either way offences Control of 3 1 -- 1 -- -- Pollution Act 1974-- other sections S.110(2)(a) Fail to comply with any Environment 2 4 -- 4 3 2 requirements of S.108 which Act 1995 specifies the powers of S.110(2)(a) enforcing authorities and persons authorised by them Fail or refuse to provide Environment -- 3 -- -- 2 1 facilities, assistance, Act 1995 information or to permit S.110(2)(b) any inspection reasonably required by an authorised person in the execution of his powers or duties under A.108 Preventing any person Environment 1 5 -- 1 -- -- appearing before or from Act 1995 answering any question put S.110 (2)(c) by an authorised person under S.108(4) Obstructing an authorised Environment -- -- -- 2 1 -- person in the execution of Act 1995 his powers under S.109 S.110 (4)(a) Obstructing an authorised Environment 2 2 1 -- 1 2 person in the execution of Act 1995 his powers S.110 (4)(b) Offences relating to public Clean Air Act 43 52 35 19 17 13 health as caused by air 1993 pollution Cable burning Clean Air Act 1 -- 3 5 3 -- 1993 S.33 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. n/a = Information is not available 1 These data are on the principal offence basis 2 These offences are coded with a number of other offences, and cannot be separately identified

Legislation

Clean Air Act 1993; Control of Pollution Act 1974; Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981

Date

27 October 2004

Reference

425 c1278-80W; 192325;192326;192327;192328

House

House of Commons

Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many (a) prosecutions, (b) cautions and (c) enforcement notices there have been in each year since 1999 for offences related to (i) process industry regulations, (ii) radioactive substances regulation, (iii) waste, (iv) water quality, (v) water resources,...

Asked by

Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)

Answering body

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

27 October 2004

Reference

425 c1218-9W;425 c1219W; 192316

House

House of Commons

Number of convictions	Amount of fine (£)
4	100
4	200
2	250
4	300
2	350
1	400
2	500
1	750
1	750
2	5000
1	5750

Librarians' tools

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher