Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Attlee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in the debate. It may be convenient to remind the Committee that we have spent 28 minutes discussing a relatively minor point and we do have a lot of material to get through. I am grateful for the Minister’s clarification of the   matter. However, I am not happy with the detail of his   response to my Amendment No. 46. It is   important to remember that alcohol deadens inhibitions and judgment. I refer to the words,"““not to function or not to function properly””" in new Section 34D(12) on page 16. I believe that those words constitute a loophole. I cannot understand why the Minister cannot improve the drafting of the Bill in that regard. However, in the mean time and subject to the usual caveats, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 46 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c431-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Alcoholic drinks Breathalysers Cars Cameras Bicycles Licensing Fixed penalties Exemptions Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Police Protective clothing Lighting Motorways Safety Safety measures Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk