Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Mar and Kellie (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

This is the third of the   visibility amendments and perhaps not the strongest of the three. I go along with the noble Lord, Lord   Hanningfield. I wish that all cyclists were lit. Far too many are riding around without any lights at all. Sometimes I see people cycling with flashing or pulsating lights attached to their helmets, rucksacks or visibility belts. I presume that that is not lawful. I wonder whether the noble Baroness, Lady Crawley, will be able to tell us about that. As somebody who has been a cyclist over many years I have often wondered why the fitting of lights to bicycles is not a compulsory part of the construction. There is no guarantee that they would continue to work for ever but it would be a good start.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c441 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Alcoholic drinks Breathalysers Cars Cameras Bicycles Licensing Fixed penalties Exemptions Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Police Protective clothing Lighting Motorways Safety Safety measures Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk