Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Gibson of Market Rasen (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

I support both the previous speakers, and remind the House that I am the President of RoSPA, part of the Safer Streets Coalition—which is 29 social justice organisations from all sectors of society, who have united to raise concerns about the impact of road danger on transport choice, health, social inclusion and quality of life. The Safer Streets Coalition welcomes the principle of graduated fixed penalty points. However, they had expected the mechanism to be used only to vary penalties upward, in order to change driver attitudes to speeding and to discourage repeat offending. This was indicated in the 2000 consultation, Road Traffic Penalties. The coalition strongly objects to a reduction in points and fines. There is no evidence that lowering the penalty for   speeding will improve road safety. Speed, whether   excess—breaking the posted speed limit—or inappropriate—driving too fast for the conditions—is a contributory factor in as many as one in three road deaths. Despite this, speeding is treated more leniently than any other offence that can kill and maim. The Bill’s proposals send entirely the wrong message to drivers. I firmly believe this, and ask the Government to think again on the issue.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c444-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Alcoholic drinks Breathalysers Cars Cameras Bicycles Licensing Fixed penalties Exemptions Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Police Protective clothing Lighting Motorways Safety Safety measures Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk