Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Before my noble friend sits down, I take what he says about the detail being in secondary legislation. However, the Committee stage and subsequent stages of this Bill provide the only opportunity for noble Lords to question the framework within which the regulations will be published. The framework is what some of us do not like. The proposal is for the number of points to be reduced from a minimum of three to a minimum of two. If my noble friend would assure us and accept an amendment that substituted ““3–6””, many of us would be very happy. We would be happy that the regulations would be published and they would probably go through.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c448-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Alcoholic drinks Breathalysers Cars Cameras Bicycles Licensing Fixed penalties Exemptions Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Police Protective clothing Lighting Motorways Safety Safety measures Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:29:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260879
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260879
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260879