Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Attlee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

I agree with where my noble friend is coming from. The fact is that the police accept 80 miles per hour in good conditions, yet they have the ability to prosecute on the absolute offence of 70 miles per hour if they detect a motorist driving at 80 in bad conditions. That is the reality, but of course it is also an uncertainty. It would be better to follow the good example of the variable speed limits on the M25. I would not have an upper legal speed limit, but would use variable speed limits on all motorways. It would make for more comfortable motoring, and probably reduce congestion by eliminating problems like bunching—because it might be appropriate, for reasons of congestion, to stick to a constant 50 miles per hour. But then, the speed limits which are shown as variable should be strictly enforced. At the moment, we have an uncertain situation. Is it legal to go at 80 miles per hour on the motorway, or not? It is not legal, but the police tolerate it. To an extent, the principle is linked with my amendment about the electronic speed limits. It is a similar issue.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c473 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Alcoholic drinks Breathalysers Cars Cameras Bicycles Licensing Fixed penalties Exemptions Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Police Protective clothing Lighting Motorways Safety Safety measures Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk