Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].
Road Safety Bill [HL]
No, the technology is in place and the variable limit is enforced there. That is the distinction between Junctions 10 to 15 on the M25 and all other motorways. We do not have the technology for camera enforcement elsewhere. We are able to use quite sophisticated strategies for the speeds at which traffic should go through that very difficult area on that most congested of motorways. We may in due course develop the technology elsewhere. First, it must be proven in terms of the safety advantages it brings to the nation and, secondly, there is always the question of cost. I recognise the strength of feeling on this issue, but the case is not proven and I therefore hope that the amendment will be withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 673 c479
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Alcoholic drinks Breathalysers Cars Cameras Bicycles Licensing Fixed penalties Exemptions Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Police Protective clothing Lighting Motorways Safety Safety measures Roads Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:51:39 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260957
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260957
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260957