Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 July 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Equality Bill (HL).


Equality Bill [HL]

I thank my noble friend for that explanation of the Government’s position. The intention of the amendment was to ensure that, when a public function was performed, restrictions should not apply. I note that my noble friend feels that the amendment would be too restrictive. I am not certain that I agree with that. Never mind, I do not intend to pursue that this evening. My noble friend acknowledged that the question of the word ““expedient”” was a difficult area and said that she was willing to think about what was said. One cannot really expect anything more than that. I am grateful to the Minister for what she has said this evening. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 202 to 204 not moved.] Clause 59 agreed to. Clause 60 [Charities relating to religion or belief]: [Amendments Nos. 205 and 206 not moved.] Clause 60 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1170 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Staff Education Contracts Civil partnerships Care homes Curriculum Courts Carers Age Equality Immigration controls Gender Exemptions Faith schools Harassment Facilities Immigration officers National security Parents Local education authorities Membership Public bodies Older people Public opinion Transport Schools Training Religion Registration of births, deaths, marriages and civil partnerships Sexuality Religious freedom Religious persons Transgender people
Legislation
Equality Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk