Proceeding contribution from Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
The consequence of the changes might not be addressing the mischief with which the Government intend to deal. There is mischief because there have been examples of bogus colleges, institutions and courses. It is perfectly proper not to want someone to keep applying to come back again and again when they never pass any exams and are still here seven years after they first came. However, surely reputable, recognised and accepted universities, colleges and other places of learning that offer recognised and accepted qualifications are doing all the right things that Opposition Members—and many Labour Members—would support.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 439 c983-4
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Appeals Asylum Detainees Applications British nationality Crew Employment Housing Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Migrants Minimum wage Passengers Migrant workers Young people Refugees Small businesses Visas Immigration and Nationality Directorate British students abroad
- Legislation
- Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:17:45 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274946
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274946
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274946