Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tony McNulty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.


Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

I beg to move, that the Bill be now read the Third time. As is customary on Third Reading, I thank all the members of the Standing Committee for what seemed to me, in my limited experience of the House, to be an informed, discursive and useful debate. We had plenty of time and all the necessary matters were considered in a spirit of reasonable discourse and, on the odd day, with some intellectual rigour. Our sittings were extremely useful and productive, as is right and proper given that the Bill deals with a range of extremely serious matters in the context of an important political debate. That description applied even before the Government introduced—with agreement—the counter-terrorism clauses after the Bill had been published. That was a most unusual way of proceeding, but the House in the main will understand why things happened that way. There was a significant degree of cross-party agreement on the process, if not on the substance of those clauses.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
439 c1061 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Asylum Detainees Applications British nationality Crew Employment Housing Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Migrants Minimum wage Passengers Migrant workers Young people Refugees Small businesses Visas Immigration and Nationality Directorate British students abroad
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk