Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 29 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am most grateful to my noble friend for that thoughtful and very coherent response. I would have preferred to move the amendment in Committee but that stage carried on for so many days that I was unable to attend the final sitting. I agree that it would have been more appropriate for it to be moved as a probing amendment in Committee rather than at this late stage. I shall read very carefully what my noble friend has said, particularly the references to the various directives and other powers already in place. It seemed pretty convincing to me. On that basis, I am very happy to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 49 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c138 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Applications Costs Closures Accidents Countryside Bureaucracy Bus lanes Cars Cycling Fraud Identity cards Injuries Level crossings Large goods vehicles International cooperation Helmets Electric vehicles Police Passengers Motorcycles Proof of identity Motorway service areas Photography Taxis Registration Young people Safety Roads Road traffic offences Theft Driving licences Picnic sites
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk